Picture Attachment problem (09 Jul 2022)
Due to the extraordinary growth of the membership and resources, we are once again bumping up against hosting limits. I am working on a fix. In the meantime, the forum should function, but you won’t be able to attach images. Working as fast s we can to fix. Thanks for your patience. - Makotosun
JayB’s “New” DT1-CM(X?)
- JayB
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Site Supporter
-
- Posts: 396
- Likes received: 322
JayB’s “New” DT1-CM(X?) was created by JayB
I am not at all familiar with this model. I thought the square swingarm disappeared before this model. Any comments will be appreciated. Looks like I will be making friends with KDI. My intent is to make it a decent rider, not a correct restoration.
Sorry if the last picture is disgusting.
This message has attachments images.
Please log in or register to see it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RT325
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8888
- Likes received: 3428
Replied by RT325 on topic JayB’s “New” DT1-CM(X?)
Steel slider forks too which is pre "70. Man it'd be most interesting to know what happens to a bike like this through 50 years. Book would be a best seller.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JayB
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Site Supporter
-
- Posts: 396
- Likes received: 322
Replied by JayB on topic JayB’s “New” DT1-CM(X?)
Man it'd be most interesting to know what happens to a bike like this through 50 years. Book would be a best seller."
Yes I would like to know where it has been and what fun it has seen!
Did the DT1CMX have a window in the oil tank?
And I guess someone put body putty over the badge areas? I guess I will dig in to it and find out.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RT325
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8888
- Likes received: 3428
Replied by RT325 on topic JayB’s “New” DT1-CM(X?)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Swoop56
-
- Offline
- Site Supporter
-
- Posts: 1165
- Likes received: 680
Replied by Swoop56 on topic JayB’s “New” DT1-CM(X?)
The 70 DT1-M still had square section swingarm and steel lower fork sliders .
The round tube swingarm , and alloy fork sliders , first made their appearance on the 71 DT1 MX .
So your bike is correct in those areas , as it is .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RT325
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8888
- Likes received: 3428
Replied by RT325 on topic JayB’s “New” DT1-CM(X?)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RT325
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8888
- Likes received: 3428
Replied by RT325 on topic JayB’s “New” DT1-CM(X?)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Swoop56
-
- Offline
- Site Supporter
-
- Posts: 1165
- Likes received: 680
Replied by Swoop56 on topic JayB’s “New” DT1-CM(X?)
but that could have been replaced with the later iron liner cylinder , in the 50 + years since .
I'm none too sure about the longevity of those Chrome bores .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JayB
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Site Supporter
-
- Posts: 396
- Likes received: 322
Replied by JayB on topic JayB’s “New” DT1-CM(X?)
The bodies are aluminum, and here are a couple of better pictures:
This message has attachments images.
Please log in or register to see it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RT325
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 8888
- Likes received: 3428
Replied by RT325 on topic JayB’s “New” DT1-CM(X?)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.