×
Pictures Posting Not Working (12 Jun 2023)
Picture uploads is again unavailable. We are working on the problem. Thanks for your patience.
Makotosun
DT400 twin shock - air leak - front engine mounting
- Jammyyammy
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 279
- Likes received: 59
DT400 twin shock - air leak - front engine mounting was created by Jammyyammy
Hi all, after many hours of engine pressure testing, just about to give up, I’ve finally found an air leak.
Its on the top bolt of the front engine mounting, coming out of the end of the thread.
Does anyone know the fix for this? Is it simply a case of taking the nut and bolt out and applying thread lock/sealant or have I got something more involved on my hands?
Thanks in advance…
,
Its on the top bolt of the front engine mounting, coming out of the end of the thread.
Does anyone know the fix for this? Is it simply a case of taking the nut and bolt out and applying thread lock/sealant or have I got something more involved on my hands?
Thanks in advance…
,
This message has an attachment image.
Please log in or register to see it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RT325
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 10829
- Likes received: 4695
Replied by RT325 on topic DT400 twin shock - air leak - front engine mounting
Gosh, i don't know about all these pressure test. Sounds like you may have caused one where the wasn't one before & have forced out some sealant from the center case joint. Not sure what i'd do now apart from nothing & tighten all case screws behind the magneto & all others then stop testing it. What running issue are you trying to rectify. Could get sealant down the engine mount hole & try to spread it around but i don't know, sort of chasing your tail a bit. If its minor it may not affect running as there's a lot of sucking & blowing going on in quick succession--maybe i should rephrase that lol.
28 Aug 2021 05:25
#2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MarkT
-
- Away
- Site Supporter
-
- Posts: 14515
- Likes received: 10726
Replied by MarkT on topic DT400 twin shock - air leak - front engine mounting
How bad is the leak?
That's actually a common place on a 360/400... I think it happens when someone rides with loose engine mount bolt? Don't know for sure but engine mount bolt wasn't tight to spec on bikes I've seen this on. Only way to fix it right is to split the case and reseal.
If leak is minor, you can choose to run it... last one I saw was about 1 psi/minute with engine mount bolt removed. That's pretty bad. But with mount bolt in and torqued, it slowed way down.
That's actually a common place on a 360/400... I think it happens when someone rides with loose engine mount bolt? Don't know for sure but engine mount bolt wasn't tight to spec on bikes I've seen this on. Only way to fix it right is to split the case and reseal.
If leak is minor, you can choose to run it... last one I saw was about 1 psi/minute with engine mount bolt removed. That's pretty bad. But with mount bolt in and torqued, it slowed way down.
1963 YG1-T, 1965 MG1-T, Allstate 250, 1970 CT1b, 1971 R5, 1973 AT3MX, 1974 TS400L, 1975 RD350, 1976 DT175C, 1976 Husqvarna 250CR, 1981 DT175G, 1988 DT50, 1990 "Super" DT50, 1991 RT180, 2017 XT250
28 Aug 2021 07:24
#3
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jammyyammy
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 279
- Likes received: 59
Replied by Jammyyammy on topic DT400 twin shock - air leak - front engine mounting
Hi MarkT,
You’re spot on. 1psi/min is the leak.
I’ve cleaned/tightened the bolts and applied some thread sealant.
I’ll give it 24hrs (blue loctite says 24hrs to cure) and will test again.
Will report back.
Hopefully it will do the trick - really don’t want to split the cases….
You’re spot on. 1psi/min is the leak.
I’ve cleaned/tightened the bolts and applied some thread sealant.
I’ll give it 24hrs (blue loctite says 24hrs to cure) and will test again.
Will report back.
Hopefully it will do the trick - really don’t want to split the cases….
28 Aug 2021 07:35
#4
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- DT Tim
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
- Posts: 115
- Likes received: 55
Replied by DT Tim on topic DT400 twin shock - air leak - front engine mounting
I kind of agree with RT325, I fully rebuilt my engine and didn’t pressure test, I just assembled by the book, used a high quality sealant, checked all parts were clean and good and torqued every nut and bolt.
Fingers crossed, no noticeable faults.
Fingers crossed, no noticeable faults.
The following user(s) Liked this Post: SKYDANCER46
28 Aug 2021 14:11
#5
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- SKYDANCER46
-
- Offline
- Site Supporter
-
- Posts: 482
- Likes received: 583
Replied by SKYDANCER46 on topic DT400 twin shock - air leak - front engine mounting
I have never pressure tested a motorcycle engine in my life! rebuilt and worked on hundreds of 2 stroke motorcycles. In fact the only place i see people doing this is on this forum?
This image is hidden for guests.
This image is hidden for guests.
Please log in or register to see it.
The following user(s) Liked this Post: RT325
28 Aug 2021 18:44
#6
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MarkT
-
- Away
- Site Supporter
-
- Posts: 14515
- Likes received: 10726
Replied by MarkT on topic DT400 twin shock - air leak - front engine mounting
Short answer: Serious racers and people who don't like to waste hours and hours of time chasing down rideability issues that might be caused by an air leak spend a few minutes to pressure and vacuum test.
If the bike is running good, no real need to do it.
I first read about it in the early 70's in a "Motorcycle Repair Manual" written by Bob Greene and the editors of Motorcyclist magazine.
Never really did it until the 1980's when a defective new crank seal cost me a big race and a freshly rebuilt engine. (If you want to win at racing the engine is tuned to the edge, air leak = meltdown)
Once you have the test set up stuff it's so easy to do at the end of a rebuild that for me it's foolish not to... countless times I've found air leaks on fresh rebuilds. Some major, most probably wouldn't be noticed. But leaks tend to get worse, not better. Even if not rebuilding, if you have the carb off and the pipe off a pressure test takes like 5 minutes.
On my super DT50 project I used a brand new YZ85 engine and it had a pretty decent intake manifold leak right from Yamaha.
I've also had new seals leak... like the one in my race engine that made me a believer in testing. And a couple new seals since then. So a new seal doesn't always mean no leaks. I've found porous castings and all sorts of gasket leaks. Crank spacer/sleeves on the clutch side on the RD's seem to be prone to leaking. Stuff that's nearly impossible to find any other way is easy to find with a pressure/vacuum test.
One of the most surprising was the bike the first enduro I bought after not riding for decades and then reading an article about the first Dave Meis "Endurofest".... 1979 DT175 in really nice shape that had a classic air leak symptom... it would rev to the moon on its own and not shut off with the key. Classic air leak symptom. Previous owner spent more than I bought the bike for at shops... including the Yamaha dealer... and nobody could fix it. So he gave up on getting it running for his sons to ride and just wanted it sold. I was a little heartbroken when I looked at the receipts he gave me when I bought it and saw the dealer had pressure tested it and it passed perfectly. I did my pressure test and sure enough it held pressure perfectly. I mean held 5psi for overnight with negligible loss. It was when I tried the vacuum test I found the vacuum bled off faster than I could pump the mityvac! Had to be a seal so I packed thick grease around the ignition side seal (easiest to get to) and held vacuum. New dual lip seal from an IT175 and bike ran like new.
The surprise was that was the first time I came across an engine that held pressure perfectly but not vacuum. Usually once I've fixed all the pressure leaks, it holds vacuum fine.
If someone doesn't want to pressure/vacuum test... the answer is simple: Don't.
In my experience it's worth the minimal effort... No damage can happen unless you go over 5 or 6 psi. But if I didn't have the set up to do it and the experiences I've had over the years... including several cases of quickly finding rideability issues caused by air leaks (rather than "guessing" and playing with jetting, etc)... I probably wouldn't do it either.
If the bike is running good, no real need to do it.
I first read about it in the early 70's in a "Motorcycle Repair Manual" written by Bob Greene and the editors of Motorcyclist magazine.
Never really did it until the 1980's when a defective new crank seal cost me a big race and a freshly rebuilt engine. (If you want to win at racing the engine is tuned to the edge, air leak = meltdown)
Once you have the test set up stuff it's so easy to do at the end of a rebuild that for me it's foolish not to... countless times I've found air leaks on fresh rebuilds. Some major, most probably wouldn't be noticed. But leaks tend to get worse, not better. Even if not rebuilding, if you have the carb off and the pipe off a pressure test takes like 5 minutes.
On my super DT50 project I used a brand new YZ85 engine and it had a pretty decent intake manifold leak right from Yamaha.
I've also had new seals leak... like the one in my race engine that made me a believer in testing. And a couple new seals since then. So a new seal doesn't always mean no leaks. I've found porous castings and all sorts of gasket leaks. Crank spacer/sleeves on the clutch side on the RD's seem to be prone to leaking. Stuff that's nearly impossible to find any other way is easy to find with a pressure/vacuum test.
One of the most surprising was the bike the first enduro I bought after not riding for decades and then reading an article about the first Dave Meis "Endurofest".... 1979 DT175 in really nice shape that had a classic air leak symptom... it would rev to the moon on its own and not shut off with the key. Classic air leak symptom. Previous owner spent more than I bought the bike for at shops... including the Yamaha dealer... and nobody could fix it. So he gave up on getting it running for his sons to ride and just wanted it sold. I was a little heartbroken when I looked at the receipts he gave me when I bought it and saw the dealer had pressure tested it and it passed perfectly. I did my pressure test and sure enough it held pressure perfectly. I mean held 5psi for overnight with negligible loss. It was when I tried the vacuum test I found the vacuum bled off faster than I could pump the mityvac! Had to be a seal so I packed thick grease around the ignition side seal (easiest to get to) and held vacuum. New dual lip seal from an IT175 and bike ran like new.
The surprise was that was the first time I came across an engine that held pressure perfectly but not vacuum. Usually once I've fixed all the pressure leaks, it holds vacuum fine.
If someone doesn't want to pressure/vacuum test... the answer is simple: Don't.
In my experience it's worth the minimal effort... No damage can happen unless you go over 5 or 6 psi. But if I didn't have the set up to do it and the experiences I've had over the years... including several cases of quickly finding rideability issues caused by air leaks (rather than "guessing" and playing with jetting, etc)... I probably wouldn't do it either.
1963 YG1-T, 1965 MG1-T, Allstate 250, 1970 CT1b, 1971 R5, 1973 AT3MX, 1974 TS400L, 1975 RD350, 1976 DT175C, 1976 Husqvarna 250CR, 1981 DT175G, 1988 DT50, 1990 "Super" DT50, 1991 RT180, 2017 XT250
The following user(s) Liked this Post: 2fishkev, RT325, JayB, Jammyyammy, Sneezles61
28 Aug 2021 20:08
#7
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jammyyammy
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 279
- Likes received: 59
Replied by Jammyyammy on topic DT400 twin shock - air leak - front engine mounting
Good news - I have fixed the leak that I had.
It’s now down to half a psi per minute. Not too sure if that is ‘acceptable’ or not? - please let me know your thoughts (directed to the pro pressure testing members of the forum)
Thanks again…
It’s now down to half a psi per minute. Not too sure if that is ‘acceptable’ or not? - please let me know your thoughts (directed to the pro pressure testing members of the forum)
Thanks again…
29 Aug 2021 11:58
#8
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MarkT
-
- Away
- Site Supporter
-
- Posts: 14515
- Likes received: 10726
Replied by MarkT on topic DT400 twin shock - air leak - front engine mounting
Starting at 5 or 6 psi, if a used engine loses more than one psi in three minutes, you may start to notice issues.
If it loses one psi a minute, you'll definitely notice issues and it will be down on power.
If it loses one psi a minute, you'll definitely notice issues and it will be down on power.
1963 YG1-T, 1965 MG1-T, Allstate 250, 1970 CT1b, 1971 R5, 1973 AT3MX, 1974 TS400L, 1975 RD350, 1976 DT175C, 1976 Husqvarna 250CR, 1981 DT175G, 1988 DT50, 1990 "Super" DT50, 1991 RT180, 2017 XT250
The following user(s) Liked this Post: Jammyyammy
29 Aug 2021 14:48
#9
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Pedalcrazy
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 687
- Likes received: 454
Replied by Pedalcrazy on topic DT400 twin shock - air leak - front engine mounting
Whatever you did to "fix" it...do more of that. Not there yet.
1978 DT400E
1976 DT400C
1973 RT3
1971 RT1B
1968 DT1 (3)
1976 DT400C
1973 RT3
1971 RT1B
1968 DT1 (3)
30 Aug 2021 19:21
#10
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: yamadmin, Makotosun, DEET, Vinnie, James Hart